Skip to main content

Editorial Policy

Editorial Policy

This page sets out how Eco Review Lab is written, reviewed and corrected. It exists so that the rules behind an article can be checked, rather than just asserted.

Last updated: 2026-09-25

Who is responsible

Every article is published under the name of the site's editor, Mark, who is accountable for what appears here. There is a person behind the byline, and that person can be reached.

How articles are produced

Articles are drafted with AI assistance and edited before publication. The drafting tool is used to structure the material and write it up; it is not the source of the facts. Every article is held to the sourcing rules below, and any statement that cannot meet them is removed rather than softened.

Sourcing rules

  • Regulated limits, material composition, safety and health claims must trace to a primary source — a regulator (FDA, EPA, ECHA / EU REACH, California OEHHA, CPSC), a standards body (NIST, ASTM, ISO, USDA), or peer-reviewed literature (PubMed, EFSA).
  • Manufacturer statements are attributed to the manufacturer and labelled as what the manufacturer claims, not as established fact.
  • Unsourceable claims are cut. Where the evidence is thin or absent, the article says so explicitly instead of reaching a verdict the evidence does not support.

What we do not do

  • We do not run laboratory tests, and we do not describe testing that did not happen.
  • We do not invent measurements, prices, star ratings or product anecdotes.
  • We do not accept payment for a ranking, a verdict, or inclusion in a list.
  • We do not present marketing language as evidence. A certification is evidence; a leaf icon is not.

Corrections

If an article is wrong, out of date, or missing a source that matters, tell us through the contact page. Corrections are prioritised over new articles. When an article is corrected, the change is made in place and the review date on the article is updated; we do not quietly delete an article because a brand objects to it.

Independence, advertising and affiliate links

  • Advertising on this site is served by Google AdSense and is separate from editorial content.
  • Affiliate links, where present, are disclosed on the page. They never determine whether a product is included, how a table is ordered, or what a verdict says.
  • No brand can buy a place in a list or a favourable verdict.

See also: About Us · Mark, Editor · Disclaimer & Disclosure · Privacy Policy

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

8 Best Eco-Friendly All-Purpose Cleaners Worth Switching To (2026)

In short: Best eco-friendly all-purpose cleaner? These eight pass an ingredient-transparency and third-party certification filter — and exactly one is an EPA-registered disinfectant that kills 99.9% of germs. Prices run from $4.50 to $70. By Mark · Last updated 2026-09-25 Photo: Anastasiya Gepp · Pexels License Let's talk about what's actually in your cleaning bottle. I used to grab whatever spray was on sale. Lemon-scented this, "ultra-power" that — I didn't think twice. Then I noticed my hands would itch after cleaning day. Not a rash, exactly. Just… irritated. I started wondering: if this stuff is doing that to my skin in 10 minutes, what's it doing in our waterways? Turns out, a lot. Conventional all-purpose cleaners often contain ammonia, chlorine bleach, phthalates (for fragrance ), and quaternary ammonium compounds (quats) — most of which aren't required to be listed on the label. The EPA classifies many of these as known respiratory irr...

Zero Waste Kitchen Essentials to Start With in 2026

In short: Zero waste kitchen essentials worth starting with? The ones you will actually use — a bamboo spoon in a drawer helps nothing. Focus on items that replace high-volume disposables, and check for FSC, GOTS or FDA certification to avoid greenwashing. By Mark · Last updated 2026-09-25 Photo: cottonbro studio · Pexels License Walking into a store aisle filled with "sustainable" gadgets can feel overwhelming. Many products promise to save the planet but often fail to save you time or money. The zero-waste kitchen essentials market is booming, projected to reach $37.5 billion by 2032, but growth does not equal quality. Buyers are increasingly savvy, rejecting greenwashing in favor of products that actually work and last. This guide cuts through the noise. We have curated a list of 10 starter items ordered by their environmental impact and practical utility. For each, we look at what it replaces, a realistic price point, and an honest verdict on whether it is worth ...

Is Stainless Steel Cookware Safe? The Honest Science

In short: Is stainless steel cookware safe? For the vast majority of people, yes — the scare stories are overstated. Nickel leaching is real but limited to edge cases: high-acid foods, long simmer times and scratched surfaces. With a nickel allergy, choose 18/0. By Mark · Last updated 2026-09-25 Photo: M. Omar · Pexels License Why People Are Worried About Stainless Steel Search engines are full of questions like are stainless steel utensils safe and what are the stainless steel cookware health risks . It is easy to see why. For decades, we were told that plastic is bad, then we learned some plastics are toxic. Now, we are questioning our metals. Is stainless steel the next big environmental or health hazard? The short answer is: no, it is not inherently dangerous. However, the dangers of stainless steel cookware are real if you ignore how the metal interacts with your cooking style. Stainless steel is an alloy, not a single element. It is a mix of iron, chromium,...